<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>premium rate pay per call telephone services &#187; Telephone Scratchcard Fined £100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.premiumphoneservices.com/articles/tag/telephone-scratchcard-fined-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.premiumphoneservices.com/articles</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Telephone Scratchcard Fined £100,000 For Misleading Promotions</title>
		<link>http://www.premiumphoneservices.com/articles/2009/08/telephone-scratchcard-fined-100000-for-misleading-promotions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.premiumphoneservices.com/articles/2009/08/telephone-scratchcard-fined-100000-for-misleading-promotions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UK News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 For Misleading Promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telephone Scratchcard Fined £100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.premiumphoneservices.com/articles/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>PhonepayPlus has slapped a £100,000 fine on a company that  used scratchcards to promote a premium text service. Abstract Games (trading as  Mediaprom) has also been barred from providing or operating any scratchcard  services for six months, except those for which compliance advice has been  sought and implemented to PhonepayPlus&#8217; satisfaction.</p>
<p>The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhonepayPlus has slapped a £100,000 fine on a company that  used scratchcards to promote a premium text service. Abstract Games (trading as  Mediaprom) has also been barred from providing or operating any scratchcard  services for six months, except those for which compliance advice has been  sought and implemented to PhonepayPlus&#8217; satisfaction.</p>
<p>The service in question was promoted by a large number of  scratchcards distributed via national magazines and newspapers. Consumers were  invited to scratch off a panel to see whether they had won a prize and, if  successful (as the vast majority of participants were), they were then required  to follow instructions included on the scratchcard which explained how to claim  the prize. Those who claimed by sending a text message were also entered into a  premium rate subscription quiz service.</p>
<p>PhonepayPlus had received 132 complaints regarding the  service by the time of the original adjudication in February, and has received  more since then. Most claimed to have been misled and-or complained about the  receipt of unsolicited charged texts. The complaints clearly showed that these  consumers were unaware of the subscription nature of the service and had simply  believed that they were making a one-off payment to claim an award.</p>
<p>The Oral Hearing Tribunal found that the scratchcard designs  were misleading and were intended to maximise Abstract Games revenue. It also  found that Abstract Games Limited had been wilful in relation to the design of  the scratchcards, which had made it probable that consumers responding to the  competition and seeking to claim their awards by text would not realise that  they were also subscribing into a quiz service.</p>
<p>The Oral Hearing Tribunal also found (as was admitted by  Abstract Games Limited) that some scratchcards had failed to give information  which was likely to affect a consumer&#8217;s decision to participate, and in  particular an adequate description of the competition prizes. The scratchcards  failed to include the number of low value prizes on offer which could have  misled consumers into believing that their chances of winning a high value award  were greater than they were.</p>
<p>Simon Bates, PhonepayPlus Director of Standards &amp;  Communications commented: &#8220;The Tribunal&#8217;s decision serves as a reminder that  misleading promotions and, in particular, subscription services masquerading as  one-off payments, are wholly unacceptable and will be met with tough sanctions.  Any provider that is in any doubt as to how to promote such services should  contact us for compliance advice and guidance.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.premiumphoneservices.com/articles/2009/08/telephone-scratchcard-fined-100000-for-misleading-promotions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

