News Archives

Adult Sex Exchange Fined £50,000 By UK Telecom Regulators

PhonepayPlus received 20 complaints relating to a virtual chat service operating on shortcodes 69844 and 89949. The service was entitled the “Adult Sex Exchange” and was advertised as a contact and adult dating service. The Executive monitored the service which was entered by texting a key word to a shortcode, as advertised in the Daily Sport. Arising from the complaints and its own monitoring, the Executive alleged, amongst other things, that users were not receiving a £10 spend reminder and that users who had sent ‘STOP’ in respect of promotions were still receiving them.PhonepayPlus invoked its Emergency Procedure in respect of the alleged breach of paragraph 7.3.3b of the the PhonepayPlus Code of Practice (11th Edition Amended April 2008) (‘the Code’), issuing a direction to the Mobile Network Operators to immediately withhold revenue and bar access to the services.

Following further investigation, PhonepayPlus raised the following potential breaches under the Code:

  • Paragraph 3.3.3 – Adequate technical quality
  • Paragraph 5.2 – Legality
  • Paragraph 5.4.1a – Fairness (Misleading)
  • Paragraph 5.7.1 – General pricing provision (Cost)
  • Paragraph 5.8 – Contact Information
  • Paragraph 5.11b – Use of the word ‘free’
  • Paragraph 7.3.2c – Virtual chat services – group text conditions
  • Paragraph 7.3.3b – Informing user of cost after £10 – require positive response to continue

The Tribunal did not uphold the alleged breach under paragraph 7.3.2c but upheld the remainder. The revenue generated by the service fell within Band 2 (£250,000-£500,000).The Tribunal considered the case to be serious, issued a Formal Reprimand and imposed a fine of £50,000 (comprising £40,000 in respect of the upheld breaches with an uplift of £10,000  in respect of breach history). The Tribunal ordered the Information Provider to seek compliance advice in respect of this and all similar virtual chat services (whether or not these incorporated a contact or dating element) within two weeks of the publication of the Tribunal’s decision, such advice to be implemented to the satisfaction of the Executive within two weeks of it being given. The Tribunal also ordered that claims for refunds are to be paid by the Information Provider for the full amount spent by complainants, except where there is good cause to believe that such claims are not valid.

Information Provider Antiphony, Buckingham-shire
Service Provider WIN (Wireless Information Network) Plc, High Wycombe
Service Name Adult sSex Exchange (Virtual Chat)
Breaches upheld against Antiphony, Buckingham-shire
Procedure Emergency (2 October 2009)
Case reference 812535

Administrative Costs awarded: 100%


Comments are closed.